The P2P program uses a structured process that takes approximately 2 to 3 years to complete. The ODP provides leadership, support, funding, and coordination for the program. Partners from across the NIH, other federal agencies, content-area experts, and community members help plan each workshop.
Workshop planning takes place in three phases: (1) proposal review and approval, (2) planning and implementation, and (3) dissemination and follow-up.
NIH ODP Pathways to Prevention Process
Proposal Review and Approval
Step 1: Proposal Submission
NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices (ICs) may submit a proposal for a P2P workshop. Other government agencies or trans-agency workgroups, professional societies, and advocacy organizations may propose topics in collaboration with an NIH IC sponsor.
A P2P workshop topic must:
- Have a primary or secondary disease prevention focus.
- Have broad public health importance. The review committee will consider the severity of the problem, feasibility of interventions, and the need to have a better understanding of the current research gaps.
- Have limited published data, or incomplete or underdeveloped research.
- Have a need for synthesis and critical assessment of the current state of the science.
Step 2: ODP Review
The ODP reviews workshop proposals on a rolling basis to see if they meet the P2P workshop topic criteria. Accepted proposals move to the workshop planning and implementation phase. Once a proposal is accepted, the ODP initiates a review of the grant portfolio in the workshop topic area and works with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to commission a systematic evidence review through AHRQ’s Effective Health Care Program.
Workshop Planning and Implementation
Step 3: Organizational Meeting
A committee of federal employees reviews the scope, key questions, and timing of the workshop and nominates members of the Content-Area Experts Group and the workshop panel.
About the Workshop Panel
Each workshop panel is an unbiased group of five to six members with diverse professional and personal perspectives. The panel gives a balanced, objective, and informed assessment of the workshop topic.
The panel attends the full workshop, where they listen to and ask questions about presentations from expert speakers. The panelists then write a report that synthesizes all the information presented during the workshop and identifies research needs and gaps.
Panel members receive an honorarium for their efforts and reimbursement for travel expenses related to their participation in the P2P workshop.
While ODP staff provide administrative and technical support to workshop panels, each panel is independent. Panel reports and recommendations do not require NIH approval and are not policy statements of the NIH or the federal government.
Step 4: Content-Area Experts Group Meeting
Content-Area Experts Group members are experts in the workshop topic. They are a diverse group of professionals and advocates from a variety of settings, including the federal government, academia, clinical practice, and patient communities. During the Content-Area Experts Group Meeting, these experts work together to make recommendations about the workshop’s key questions, agenda, and speakers.
Step 5: P2P Workshop
The workshop includes presentations by experts on the workshop topic and the AHRQ-supported Evidence-based Practice Center that conducted the systematic evidence review. Public questions and comments are encouraged during discussion periods following each workshop session.
On the day of the workshop, AHRQ releases its draft systematic evidence review for public comment.
After assessing the systematic evidence review, expert presentations, and public comments, the workshop panel writes a draft report that summarizes the workshop and identifies research gaps and future priorities.
Workshop Report and Follow-Up
Step 6: Post Workshop Dissemination
Within a few weeks of the workshop, the ODP posts the panel's draft report for public comment.
After reviewing the public comments, the panel prepares a final report, which is posted on the ODP website and published in a peer-reviewed journal along with the final systematic evidence review. The recommendations in the panel’s report are intended for use by the broader research community. Although the NIH convenes the P2P workshops, panel reports are not policy statements of the NIH or the federal government.
Step 7: Federal Partners Meeting
The ODP brings together partners from federal agencies who work in areas related to the workshop topic to review the panel report recommendations, explore opportunities for collaboration, and outline the next steps to move the field forward. After the meeting, the ODP publishes a Federal Partners Meeting Report summarizing the discussion and proposed action plan.
Step 8: Evaluation and Impact Assessment
To better understand the effectiveness of the P2P program, the ODP evaluates the program’s processes, implementation, and impact such as:
- Publication of new funding initiatives
- Increased collaboration among the federal partners on the P2P topic
- Implementation of recommendations from the panel’s final report and the federal partners’ action plan
- Citations of workshop publications.
The results of this evaluation help guide decisions about the program and future workshops.