Gaps (and Gasps!) in Medical-Ethical Reasoning: From Ethical Theory to Medical Practice
Heidi Malm, Ph.D.
Professor of Philosophy and Bioethics
Loyola University Chicago
October 29, 2009
2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Building 50 Conference Room
NIH Campus | Bethesda, Maryland
About the Seminar
Good healthcare practice and policy cannot be developed on the basis of scientific evidence alone. Also essential are value-laden or “moral” judgments which, for example, prioritize some endpoints over others (e.g., quality of life over quantity of life), and sanction some means of achieving those endpoints but prohibit others (e.g., Is informed consent always necessary? May harm be caused to some in order to prevent greater harm to others?).
This presentation demonstrated how the methods that contemporary ethical theorists use to develop, test and apply moral judgments are similar to the methods that medical scientists use to develop, test and apply their evidence. It examined several flaws, cognitive biases, and under-appreciated distinctions within medical-ethical reasoning (each of which has a sibling in scientific reasoning) that give rise to gaps between ethical theory and medical practice. The discussion dealt with medical-ethical issues involving the prevention of harm, including cancer prevention, public health, and pandemic planning.
About Heidi Malm
Heidi Malm is Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago. Her areas of specialization include ethical theory, bioethics and the philosophy of law. Her academic research focuses on ethical issues involving autonomy and the prevention of harm, with a current focus on issues within the field of preventive medicine and law. She has published on the topics of killing vs. letting die, legal paternalism, medical screening, bad Samaritan laws and the duty to aid, consent and the law on rape, and surrogate motherhood, and her articles have appeared in a variety of high-profile journals including Ethics, The Hastings Center Report, Law and Philosophy, American Journal of Bioethics and Philosophy & Public Affairs. A recent article Dr. Malm co-authored, Ethics, Pandemics, and the Duty to Treat, appeared in the American Journal of Bioethics (2008), received much fanfare and is frequently cited. The article addresses the very timely topic of the healthcare workers' duty to treat in times of pandemics; matters of interest to academicians and practitioners in medicine, law, philosophy, public health, and government.
Dr. Malm also works on issues related to ethics and preventive medicine, in particular, ethical issues related to medical screening for diseases such as cancer, as well as the furthering of evidence-based medicine. She has served as the bioethicist on several committees for the National Institutes of Health and has been an invited speaker at numerous schools of medicine and public health, including Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and Northwestern.
Bridging the Gap between What Health Professionals Should Do to Help Smokers Quit and What They Actually Do: What is the Role of Public Health Care Workers and the NIH?
Steven Schroeder, M.D.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Achieving Scientific Equity for the Prevention of Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders in Minorities and Other Populations
C. Hendricks Brown, Ph.D.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Helping Smokers With Behavioral Health Comorbidity Requires a National Effort
Jill Marie Williams, M.D.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Raising the Bar: Engineering Optimized Behavioral Interventions for Increased Public Health Impact
Linda M. Collins, Ph.D.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Evidence-Informed Factors for Promoting Psychological Resilience in the U.S. Military
Terri Tanielian, M.A.
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Cancer Care: The Patient’s Role, Palliative Care, and Implications for Health Policy
Amy Berman, R.N.
Friday, August 3, 2012
Communicating Possible Harms and Benefits of Treatment and Lifestyle
Professor David Spiegelhalter, OBE, FRS
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The Evidence-to-Practice Gap: Teaching Clinicians Evidence-based
W. Scott Richardson, M.D.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
The Pressure To Get It Right: Biases in Biomedical Research
John Ioannidis, M.D., D.Sc.
Monday, March 19, 2012
Innovative Approaches to Clinical Trials
Robert M. Califf, M.D.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
View All Previous Seminars